Instructor Presence in the Online Class – Key to Learner Success »
This was a great article, with more information than you’d expect. Here are two of their ideas:
How the Instructor can establish presence
- The professor as a real person: Our instructors create a one to two minute welcome video. Students watch the clip during the first few days of the class. Instructors create a YouTube video clip (can be private), or create a .mov file on their laptop and upload the clip to our Learning Management platform. I love these clips – each are unique as the professor. Some are filmed in the instructor’s office, outside, or even in a coffee shop. These clips make the professor ‘real’ and set the tone for an open and interactive learning community.
- Communicating regularly: Posting a weekly announcement with course updates, web resources, commenting on course discussion boards and/or upcoming assignments also seems to be an effective method by the instructor communicating ‘en masse’. Using humour strategically can also break the ice and make the class fun, with a humourous YouTube clip or comic.
I’m currently enrolled in online classes, working towards my M.A.Ed. I can’t tell you how important these are. I would add, though, that if the instructor doesn’t understand basic internet etiquette, I would rather have them not participate. For example, for the last two terms, I’ve seen instructors ‘yell’ (capslock, bold, and red) at students for asking (completely reasonable) questions in the questions forum. One student actually talked about dropping out after that. Alternatively, they answer every question by linking to a rubric that doesn’t answer the question.
Maybe it’s just me,
but these all seem like pretty shabby reasons to unschool. Homeschooling and unschooling in the US education model might be right for some people, and there are lots of reasons for that, but these really bug me, both because they discredit a lot of the legitimate reasons people do it and because they’re traits and experiences LOTS of kids who wouldn’t benefit from unschooling probably share.
I almost never even check the #education tag anymore. It used to be full of things that added to my knowledge, both of education itself and of the people working in the field (whether traditionally or in other ways). Now, most days, I get a lot more from the unmoderated #teaching tag, so I usually pay more attention to that.
It’s always pretty easy to tell which posts get promoted by which editors, too. Variety of voices is nice, sure, because the input of a variety of kinds of educators with a variety of philosophies is important, but this has been more than that, and not often in a positive way.
I agree that this list describes many attributes of general students, not just those who need to unschool. I hated being a freshman in high school, I love to read, I felt trapped in classes below my level, I hate busy work for the sake of keeping quiet, but homeschooling wasn’t my solution. It wasn’t right for me. What was right for me? Taking AP classes and getting a head start on my college education. I shared classes with people who shared my interests, the material was more challenging, we were asked to think and challenge instead of memorize, and I thrived.
Maybe that post would be better off if it was “You might want to consider unschooling/homeschooling if…” Not “You SHOULD…”
(via girlwithalessonplan)
I have 0 interest in telling someone what they “can” or “can’t” say
Or even what they should say.
I just believe in a human being’s ability to realize that they have the potential to hurt someone with what they’re doing, and stop themselves from doing it. I believe in empathy and compassion. And I believe you can still be funny or flirty or sexy or brilliant without hurting someone.
So revolutionary and “fascist” (legit just saw someone call me that) of me.
Did you not know that telling someone that they aren’t funny and that their words can hurt is how all fascists get their start? Like In this clip, Fozzy Bear is clearly the biggest fascist of all time. You know, wanting other people to pause and think about what they’re saying instead of walking around hurting each other because the have the legal right to do it. Ugh, how rude of him. Assholes on the internet: Just because it’s A right doesn’t make it right.
“I thought Ted was a little bit … pretentious.”
Ted is the worst part of that show. Anyone who says otherwise is just wrong.
(via justgivemenovember)
Researcher Suggests Ratings System for YA Books
This is an interesting idea. I can see the merits of it - I have accidentally picked up YA books that were much too young for me but didn’t appear to be (not that it is a bad thing, just not what I wanted).
But i think there is a downside too: policing of the books ya are seeking.
I personally just think we need a clearer distinction between “YA” meant for 13-year-olds and “YA” meant for 22-year-olds. Both age groups are technically within the window of the YA audience (middle grade tends to target the 10-13 crowd, while adult novels are usually geared toward people who are beyond college age, though neither is always 100% true), but writers, readers, and the people who act as mediators between those groups (publishers, booksellers, teachers, librarians, etc) all have different perceptions as to what the YA audience is depending on which ones you talk to. Obviously the books written for somebody who’s 13 or 15 or 18 or 22 are all going to need to be different in terms of content and reading level. The YA category as a descriptor is, in my mind, mostly useless most of the time.
A rating system also runs the risk of creating a sweeping line for removing materials from YA collections, which is also not good, but I’m honestly more and more concerned lately, as people discuss YA more often, that we’re almost never having the same conversations just because the term means so little.
GWALP adds: Now that I know more about Lexile scores, I wonder if there would be value adding that to books. ”Along Came A Spider” falls in the middle school Lexile range, but would you have a middle schooler read that book?
GWALP, I actually did read that book in middle school. We had independent book journals, and I basically alternated between King, Patterson, and Crichton. That said, I wouldn’t put it on a reading list or recommend it without talking to parents first.
Tumblr bomb! Christian blogger asks, "Do you support the President's stand on same-sex marriage?" »
It looks like it’s already been bombed (The Yesses are at 91.27%), but more votes can’t hurt.
-Jess
http://www.visionforum.com/news/blogs/doug/2012/05/10135/
His next post is all about him being sad because the results were at 90% against, and then reversed overnight, and there are more votes than regular readers. Because taking a poll on a conservative Christian website is totally scientific and impartial and WAAAAAAAAAH LIBERALS WAAAAAAAAH!
You know what’s not funny? Hate. You know what’s also not funny? People going on hate-filled rants. However, you know what is funny, people going on hate-filled rants that make so little sense that they sound like someone took the worst comments from a political message board, mixed all the words around, translated them to Japanese, and then translated them back. And that’s what happened at a council meeting in Lincoln, Nebraska and it resulted in one of the craziest videos you’ll see this week.
Recently, Nebraskan cities have been trying to deal with the lack of protection that LGBT citizens have from discrimination. The state’s anti-discrimination laws don’t cover sexual orientation. YouTube user aksarbent has been uploading videos of some of the more interesting moments from hearings on the issue. One of them, he or she labeled “Best in Show!” and, good lord, is that not hyperbole.
I promise this is the best video you’ll watch today. Just….wow.
Just as an FYI, this woman has been diagnosed with schizophrenia and lives in an assisted living facility. Although I’m not sure about her true beliefs regarding sexual orientation, I feel like all of the people making fun of her and calling the video “crazy” are unnecessary. I mean, the entire rant seems like word salad to me, a common issue in individuals with schizophrenia. She’s not a danger to herself or others, so they can’t really stop her from talking at an open forum.
http://journalstar.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/video-of-testifier-s-anti-gay-words-goes-viral-but/article_82ec7104-4062-5988-8e56-8effde1ff202.html#ixzz1uiNoFunP
temporarydust replied to your post: So apparently Tumblr is just full of shitdicks…
Just today?Well, today in particular. Aaron’s getting hatemail for basically being a human being who has shitty days.
I wonder what it is about me that brings that out in people.
Fucking seriously.
It’s pretty much the story of my fucking life.
I get the feeling that a lot of people don’t expect you to really have any personality, which is just such bullshit. I don’t fucking understand it. You’re not obligated to ANYONE when it comes to the material you post and if people don’t like it they can go fuck themselves.
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡 ┻━┻
Some of the comments from other people implying that child support and custody is ALWAYS about control and punishment made me feel uncomfortable, but I’m an adult so I tried to ignore it. I will admit to almost sending an ask to this effect, but didn’t want to add to the drama. Aaron’s situation is horrible, he should have more control over his situation, support shouldn’t be biased against men, and he can feel however he wants to about his situation, but it isn’t typical. I think that a few of the comments and asks were starting to move towards some of the shit you see on Men Going Their Own Way. A lot of people who seek child support honestly do it in the best interest of their child, not to punish the ex. Although this isn’t the case in Aaron’s situation, I feel like there was some cutting down of women who legitimately need child support to maintain their family by people who aren’t Aaron, and that isn’t cool. That said, Aaron has the right to feel feelings and to post whatever he wants without greyfaces trying to imply that he somehow planned for his divorce to happen or is a horrible person for questioning a flawed system.
agathokakological: Gender Equality: »
- Women can do everything men can do.
- Men can do everything women can do.
- Women are not a special interest group.
- Women should not be given any special privileges men don’t get.
- Men should not be given any special privileges women don’t get.
- Women have every opportunity in society men do.
- …
Men get called creeps when they make someone feel uneasy, threatened or objectified. Women get called sluts because they’re women. I will get called a slut if someone dislikes me, if I wear a dress or shorts or show an inch of skin, if I choose to wear makeup, if I wear heels, if I talk about sex, if I have sex, if I use birth control, if I don’t use birth control, if I reject someone’s advances, if I choose to ignore someone’s cat calls and “compliments”, etc. You will get called a creep if you approach someone in a way that makes them uncomfortable.
I really don’t understand this whole “creep shaming” thing. I knew one guy that I called creepy, because he was outright, unapologetically predatory. Any woman near him would be caressed, hit on, and just generally treated like they were a prop there for his amusement. So, yeah, he was creepy. It does not compare to slut shaming. I’ve been called a slut for having sex too early, and I was called a prude for not having sex early enough- IN THE SAME RELATIONSHIP. Every woman is subject to being insulted because of their sexual behavior. Sometimes, the behavior is assumed. A virgin can be called a slut because people don’t like they way she dresses. It’s just not the same realm of labeling.
If anything, we can try to compare “creep shaming” to calling a woman “crazy.” I still don’t think that it’s a fair comparison, but it’s closer. My problem with this comparison is mainly that “crazy” is so subjective (also, pretty ableist, but we’ll put that aside). Most of the time, a man is labeled creepy for fitting into a pretty straightforward set of parameters- mainly that he seems predatory or disrespectful of clear boundaries. However, women are labeled “crazy” for pretty much everything. A woman wants to have sex more than her partner? CRAZY (and a slut)! A woman wants to wait until they know someone very well before sex? CRAZY (and a prude)! A woman gets mad when it turns out that the person that she thought she was dating exclusively has 4 other partners? CRAZY! A woman gets mad in general? CRAZY! A woman cries for pretty much any reason ever? CRAZY!
Reblog if people say you don’t look your age.
Yes…I usually hear 23 ….idk if that’s good or bad.
People say I look 25 clean shaven and 40 with a beard. LoL!
People tell me I am in my low to mid-twenties.
Everyone at work thinks I’m 16-17.
I’m 37, most people guess I’m in my mid-to-late 20’s.
I got IDed twice the last time I went to an R rated movie (over the summer). Once buying the ticket, and the manager ran over to me and asked me for it while I was trying to enter the theater. Tomorrow is my 26th birthday, and my hair is starting to turn grey. Maybe they think it’s highlights?
(Source: thisistiffanyle)

